Previous | Next
188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221 of 512
strong opposition to air pollution controls, which we were in favor of. We felt this again in
connection with the auto industry's resistance to air pollution controls, and to other safety
4We felt it in respect to the so-called bottle deposit legislation, which I favored as an anti-litter and energy saving device, but which was opposed by Mr. William May, president of the American Can Company and member of the New York Times Board of Directors, who both directly and indirectly attempted to influence the Times' position on this subject.
I felt increasingly, and discussed this with some concern with my immediate colleagues,
By that you mean on the (editorial) page?
On the page, exactly, whom I mentioned in the previous talk, Raskin and
Hechinger particularly, and our economic people, first Murray Rossant and subsequently
Leonard Silk, the last few years, what we felt were pressures on us to modify our views.
One time, the publisher asked me to come out to Detroit with him. This was in 1972, to
visit the Chrysler organization, at their invitation, of course, to simply show what they
were planning for the future, particularly in respect to the then very, very touchy question
of auto emissions. A trip had been set up by the Chrysler executives, requesting the
publisher and the managing editor, Rosenthal, and me to go out to Detroit, fly out in their
plane, have lunch with the executives, and see everything that they had to show us.
© 2006 Columbia University
Libraries | Oral History
Research Office | Rights and
Permissions | Help