Previous | Next
473474475476477478479480481482483484485486487488489490491492493494495496497498499500501502503504505506507508509510511512 of 512
the country -- which, of course, a lot of people did, mistakenly, because I really think those
two things could and should go together -- but in any case, Bush would always come out on
the economic interest side that appealed, basically, to the mainstream Republican party
rather than on the environmental side. And although I haven't read that piece you're
referring to in a long, long time, I'm just as sure as I'm sitting here, from the title, that that
is the point that it makes.
Yes. And it was about the refusal to sign the treaty cutting down on the CD emissions.
Well, that's exactly the thing. Although that was an extremely important thing
that should have been done, it had some economic implications that Bush always felt, with
the full support of the Republican mainstream -- and, of course, support from plenty of
Democrats, too -- felt that the adverse economic implications were much more important for
the United States than the environmental benefits. Reduction of emissions eventually had
to be imposed, anyway.
Exactly. Well, I thought maybe I'd like to give a little bit of time to asking you, outside
the newspaper, outside your columns, outside your Op-Ed pieces, something about your
involvement in the environmental movement. Some of your personal involvement outside
the newspaper. You had a membership in several organizations.
You mean in NRDC [National Resources Defense Council] and things like that?
Yes. Your activities on Martha's Vineyard, or whatever.
© 2006 Columbia University
Libraries | Oral History
Research Office | Rights and
Permissions | Help