| |
By
Melissa Warden
Why would anyone in her right mind want to spend a precious Sunday
evening writing a column for "The Moment?" This is not an easy
question to answer, especially if, like me, she was:
- Not an engineer.
- Stressed beyond the reckoning of years.
- Confused about the Politically Correct way to refer to the third person, and aware that "they" is a decidedly bad way to go if one is concerned about grammar.
- Convinced that pretty much everything is futile, and of the
opinion that shouting at the gods is just as effective as anything
else.
- Perhaps that last one was over the top.
Now that I have spent a few minutes thinking of reasons why I should
not be writing this column, I'm not so sure that I should keep hitting
this keyboard. But none of the above seems to matter when I thought
about what writing this column would actually mean. It means that I
get to choose a nifty topic that is very interesting to me and spend
some time researching it. I get to tell an intelligent, and more
importantly, interested audience about it, and I get to rationalize
all of this because I am being "productive".
Although this column is officially about mathematics, I will be
stretching this limit from time to time. One of the most beautiful
things about math is that it is essentially a study of patterns -
number patterns, shape patterns, patterns found in nature, patterns
found in human thought. But pattern is found everywhere, in many
areas that are not commonly thought to lie within this domain. It is
seen in music, literature, science, art, philosophy - in most areas of
human experience. To forbid the discussion of subjects within these
areas would seem somewhat artificial, so they might sneak in from time
to time.
One interesting topic that skirts these boundaries rather nicely is
the Fibonacci sequence. This sequence is generated by adding the two
previous elements of the sequence together to produce the next number.
It can be expressed like this:
F(n) = F(n-1) + F(n-2)
where F(n) is the nth Fibonacci number. It is typically started with
seed values of 0 and 1, yielding this sequence:
0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21,...
It is also possible to create other sequences using the same pattern
with other seed values; these sequences are interesting topics in
their own right. An amazing property of this sequence is that the
ratio of adjacent terms approaches a set value (1.61803398...) as the
terms get larger - this number is precisely the ratio resulting from
the division of a line into two parts, such that the ratio of the
smaller part to the larger part is the same as the ratio of the larger
part to the line as a whole.
This number, an irrational number, can be found by solving a simple
quadratic equation, and is called the golden mean or the golden ratio.
It has a couple of very unusual and quite wonderful properties - if
you subtract 1 from it, it becomes its own reciprocal, and if you add
1 to it, it becomes its own square! If you think that you can do it,
try to find another number that behaves like this.
The Fibonacci sequence seems to capture the pattern seen in many areas
of life, from the growth of computer databases to the behavior of the
stock market. The golden ratio that can be extracted from this
sequence was thought to be the most aesthetically pleasing way to
divide a line, and was used liberally in art and architecture - it can
be found in the Parthenon and other Greek constructions. It also
shows up in areas completely outside of human control, such as the
patterning of the spiral in mollusk shells and the growth of plants in
the wild. It, like pi, appears in the most unexpected of places, and
derives much of its charm from this fact.
Just A Thought: Do you think it is possible that the sequence of pi
contains the sequence of e, or vice versa? What about both?
|
|
 |
|

Email the Author

Mathematica: The Grand Unification
Columbia University Mathematics Department
|