FIVE == METRICAL FEET

 

Traditional Urdu prosody uses a set of words called afaa((iil [afaa((iil] which are of great practical value to the student. Each of the afaa((iil both names and metrically embodies one particular kind of foot, or rukn [rukn]. A suitable inventory of the afaa((iil can thus provide an accurate account of the metrical feet traditionally used in Urdu poetry. Furthermore, the afaa((iil are used in every poetic and critical context, in every formal and informal discussion of Urdu meter. Therefore the student will certainly need and want to know them.

The afaa((iil all originate from the Arabic three-letter verb root { f + (( + l }, or fa((l , meaning "to do." They are derived in fixed ways, and transformed according to fixed rules, which were developed in the context of classical Arabic and Persian poetic theory. If you want to study the whole set of afaa((iil systematically, you'll find some suitable works listed in the Bibliography. Our approach here is strictly practical: we will look only at the afaa((iil actually used in Urdu poetry.

The afaa((iil are considered to be of two kinds: a small number of original or saalim [saalim] ones, and a large number of variant or muzaa((f [muzaa((f] forms derived from these. When a line of poetry can be divided into feet in more than one way, the best division is considered to be the one which relies more on original afaa((iil , and less on variants.

The [afaa((iil] are listed below, with internal syllable divisions indicated, along with the syllable patterns they represent and embody. The [saalim] ones are starred. The order in which they are given is intended to make them easily findable: those with the greatest number of initial long syllables are listed first.

(= = =) [maf-((uu-lun] -- { maf((uulun }

(= = - =) [mus-taf-((i-lun]* -- { mustaf((ilun }

(= = -) [maf-((uu-l] -- { maf((uul }. Usually occurs as the first foot, except in rubaa((ii [rubaa((ii].

(= =) [fa((-lun] -- {fa((lun }

(= - = =) [faa-((i-laa-tun]* -- { faa((ilaatun }

(= - = -) [faa-((i-laa-t] -- { faa((ilaat }

(= - =) [faa-((i-lun]* -- { faa((ilun }

(= - - =) [muf-ta-((i-lun] -- {mufta((ilun }. Rare.

(= -) [fa((-l] -- { fa((l }

(=) [fa((] -- { fa(( }. Usually occurs as the last foot; rare except in [rubaa((ii]

(- = = =) [ma-faa-((ii-lun]* -- {mafaa((iilun }

(- = = -) [ma-faa-((ii-l] -- { mafaa((iil }. Rarely occurs as the first or last foot.

(- = =) [fa-((uu-lun]* -- { fa((uulun }

(- = - =) [ma-faa-((i-lun] -- { mafaa((ilun }

(- = -) [fa-((uu-l] -- { fa((uul }

(- =) [fa-((al] -- { fa((al }

(- - = =) [fa-((i-laa-tun] -- { fa((ilaatun }

(- - = - =) [mu-ta-faa-((i-lun]* -- { mutafaa((ilun } . Rare.

(- - = -) [fa-((i-laa-tu] -- { fa((ilaatu }. Very rare; almost always occurs as the first and third foot.

(- - =) [fa-((i-lun] -- { fa((ilun }. Almost never occurs as the first foot.

In the above list there are two afaa((iil with double identities. These can be, and are, scanned in two different ways. They are:

{ fa((l }, scanned both as [fa((-l], (= -), and as [fa-((al], (- =)

{ fa((lun }, scanned both as [fa((-lun], (= =), and as [fa-((i-lun], (- - =)

There is nothing to be done about this; they must simply be accepted as parts of the traditional system. Modifications in them to eliminate ambiguity have often been proposed, but haven't been adopted in practice.