C.OLUM1.1A DAILY SPECTATOR
APRIL 27. 1968
Coiumbia^Spegtator
A Glimmer of Hope
Byyesterday stfternoon, during the fourth
aay of protest and takeover at Columbia,
ttie faculty had assurried almost complete
control oi' peace-keeping functionĸ and nego-
tíations. Bolh students and faculty haci simply
realized that the administration was incapable
of handlíng the situation. The administration
tiad yielded to the initiative of the faculty.
the demonstrators had shown enough willing-
ness to carry on talkĸ .all day, and the Major-
ily Coalition, whieh is opposcd to tho tactics
oí the demonstrators, was beginning to look
lo the facully for answers.
While the faculty, in its controllingposition,
did not bring about an end to the dcmonstra-
tions, it did manage to maintain peace on
Lne campus for the day. By last níght, the
faculty secmed to be settling in for a weekend
01 peace-kceping and negotiatĩne, by adoptine
plans for food-details, around-the-clock watch
es, and negotiating eommittees.
ĩt seems clear iha while student control
of buildings may continue through Ihe w,.el_..i.d.
only the faculty will be able to bring forth
a reasonable, acceptable, and non-víolent
lution. Interferetĸi:, vvhelher it comes f:
meclclliiig Ijy thc aclministration or threats
from the Majority Ct.alition, can only impede
the progress toward a solution.
One of the fundai.icuial eh:inges towardwhich
úoth the demonstrators and the faculty seem
to be rm.ving ís the right of students and
faculty al Columbia to make decisions et
cerriing issues such as diseiplinary acti,
Yesterday afternoôn-, the facuĩty worked oul
with the adminisiration a preeedent through
which a tri-partile eommittee would make
reconitiii'ndations cotioci'uing discipline and
have the power to delegate an appeal l.ocly
which would have binding power to deeide
on ctisciplinary appeals. Clearly this does not
go far enough, as thc rejection of the pro-
posal hy Students lor a Democralíc Socicty
seemcd to indicate. The actual authority oí
Ihe tri-parlite commitlee was vague andappar-
ently the list of names does not appeal to var-
ious student groups involved in the protesis
Last night, however, there was some indi-
catíon that the faculty might eonsider the est-
ablishmenl ol" a bi-partíte board of studenls
:md laculty which would have binding author-
ity on d:sci|.Iinary decisions. If a new lĩsl
ul' names could be drawn up which would be
iimenubL' to all Ihe-.major groups involved,
then ii appcars thal both thc structure and
mandaLc oi' such a cummittee woulcl !ie wholly
in lĩne with the type of renrganization that
SDS and olhers see as necessary forthefuturc
of the University.
The establishmení ol' a bi-partitc committee
would also take the sharp edge off the word
amnesty. One of the main reasons for the
plea of amnesty is lo get thp University to
admit that what the demonstrators did was
justifiable. But if SDS is to ignore what they
call the seat of illegilimate authority, as they
havc been lorced to do by the administration's
abdlcation, then they clearly have no reason
to ask Ihal administration to justify theit'
actĩon. Instead the demonstrators múst place
their l'aith in a fairly constituted bi-partite
board ,and convince that board Ihat they were
doíng whut was indeed jusliíicd. Bul justifica-
tion of actions, even if directed loward the
achievement of hiĸher goals, can be decided
onĩy after deliberalion. Acceptance of such a
commiltce would plaft' signil'icanl powerintht
Iruly legilnnatc con.stiluents of Columbia Uni-
versily. and would bring about the essenliiil
ehangc whĸ.-ti both sUidents and facuity seem
to be demanding.
not vandalism, but shamble-
.! :■ pur.ially truu until Thursday morn-
ioj:, b;ii denĸjiĸii-iitnrs spentmo.tof
Thtirsday cleaning up the oecupiod
area. As reported In yesterday's
Spectator, no dam;ii.;e could bc dis-
covcred Thursday afternoon. ĩ'ost
svriters woro repealing hearsay;
they nevcr sent a reporter into
the offices.
Less understandably, the New
Vork Times chargedthedemonstra-
tors wlth "miiii.Lliv:::" T.iur.ctcj-,
and the Dailj \r.vs -vas cliar.rin.:
thc same I'rlday.
In another arlicle Fríday, thc
Neivs muiluged to comptetel.s .ilail
its coverage ot student reactionto
tli. d'.'ii;,.. i-.Li-.it ĩini -. In ll. i.itrrsir'.s
by reporter Jo.seph Mod.-.r!,",s:.':-.i,
Jeriy Avorn '69 tried to expla..
ivhat the rcal issues behind tlie
protests werc as he sav,- them.
"At first, I wasn't surc wheĩher
I should talk to the News at all,"
Vvcn-ii said yeslk'i-ilnv after Ilii-^tnry
appeared. '-ISui I liuped ll.J mayhc
If I eíplaincd thinĸs clearly enough,
JÍCJIUL SOI't _.f 1'1'lillblc: VJCIS ul'Wt.u's
ĸoing on hcre might tríckle into the
metropolitan press.1
Aceording to Avor
supports all domunds of the domon-
strators except tltat for amiiosly.
Mass Media, Massive Mistakes
.Continiicd from Page 1J
Dr. Kirh's.prfice, Thesech
demo,ĸt..it_o:is) on campus vi
said; 'lt's just stupid.'*
The ncxt two paragraphs ĩn the
tícws story quoted Avorn as "rue-
fully" complaining that thc timing
tif the demonstrations would dis-
suade many applícants from at-
tending Columbia.
"Thc reporter ashed me whether
I thought tliis ivould ii.ivk' sucti an
effect, and I agreed that it might.
But that is a very minor consider-
ation in the face of what is really
at stake here. It took up about two
minutes of the half-hour talk
we had."
Avorn, an editorofSpoctaĩor,also
suffercd at the hands of the New
York Post. ColumnislJimmyBrés-
lin came to the Spectalor office
Thursday afternoon to flnd outsome
facts about IDA. Aíter thu inter-
vieiv sv.is uver, Brcslin asl.i'il Iiicii
aboul what the demonstriitors had
lioii'.' i:i-.idc l.ow Library. llaving
gotien inside Low Wednesday night
to see, Avorn told him that t
, sc,-,,ii,:ly
views of Uie need for studcnl and
faculty power In the face of a Uni-
versity administration which has
made somc "terribly stupíd mis-
takes" recently.
The News ran Avorn's phnto with
i story under thc banuer headliues,
"Joe College Slunned & Angered
by DlsrupUons." Theypresented his
phrase citing stupidlty in the fol-
lowing way:
of the pre
I, (i„ (I,
Wedncsday mo.ning had dlscovered
some intercsting reporl.. lu Presi-
dent Kirh's office. Onc of these
sva. llie l'rosidei.i's .i.py ní" ;; 1.1.7
report on the state of Columbia,
ti-iuii sviiich ii_ liad delctcil scveral
ĩacts about the University's rela-
iioll .1 i[) '.■-illl tilt' cocilcir.iiiily, .inci iii-
i-c.-ir'iiriili runiriicls csiili lln'Drjiiirc-
meut of Defense,
"As a journalist, I fclt it was
my í-e-pimsibility to at least takc
down the maicri;:! Lhr •■!).-, ijuciijIo
hatl sIio'.sji iiic," Avorn said. "At
the tjme, I had no plans " on pub-
lishing II. But if the Prcsident wa.
suppressihg facts, it seemed that
there should be a record ofitsomc-
where. When llresliiUMMi.illyasked
me about the deleted
Letters to the Editor
and made the mistake ol
tclling him, off the record."
The neri morning, the secret
material appeaivil in l.i-cĸlin';,('(il-
umn, "A Day at Columbia." It
was doscribod as having bcen found
the night' before by Avorn, "when
tie ĸcnt through Presídent Grayson
Kirk's file cabinets."
The New Yorlt Times charged in
an editorial Thursday that thu
icmonstrators were not interc-in!
ruptlon, and quoted student parti-
clpation in the Presidential cam-
pnign (a.s did tlic l'asi I'ridi.y) ns
:i.i r'iiiiuptc nf 1h.iv k, ;;o ilir(,.i;:h
"legitimate" channels. SDS has
proĩcstcd against the gym a__d IDA
"loRally" for several months, even
though students have no institution-
ali-od role in dccision-maliin:: nl
Columbĩa .
The Times printed Thursday that
íhi' íai-cilty commitĩce had votcd
" continuation ot the assoeiation"
with IDA. This way an error: The
issue was never voted on at thc
rhursday mcctines. The News, the
mily papci- ío rri,ur! I'i-ici:,; ilini.
any faeulty membcr had stooci in
front of Ilamilton Hall and othcr
ijiiil.|iiij.'i, got thc numbor wrong—
this reporter counted 515, the News
25—and did not report why they
were there—to proteet students in-
side the building from the police.
Thls hastily-compiled list is not
complete—there weredistortions in
Jimmy Breslin's cohimninFriday's
Post on the side of the demonstra-
tors, for ejtample—but it ĩs re-
prcscntativc. Al lcast one plus to
note—both the Tíme. and ĩhe Post
printed artícles on the hi.sto.-yoflhc
gym dispute and IDA—subjects ft
papers
treated in depthbetoro.
ybotlv Co lltititc
/■;>•>
To the Editor;
IVe feel that the events of the
past few days may lead to the dc-
mise of Columbia University, The
protest demoistrations eould lead
to a loss of faculty and studcnts
and the collapse of thc fund drivc,
lĩveu now thure is little respect for
-inv linivcrsily iiudiurit.v, c.ccccl Ijy
the loss of control over thc Uni-
versíty by these authoritics. Be-
cause of their unwillingness to act,
any actlon by them now ivĩll prob-
iihly resiil: in ;i dccliiie ;n i|,i;ilit.v
cJ:n.'n[i(,ii ;ct Ci,liimb;a. Desiiilc (lic
vnlidily nl' síiiijc of thc Sliidenis
for a Demo.ratic Society'sdemands
(severing cií.ill l'niversky ties iviih
liie Ir.-titiiic iur !)_.euse .shalysis
and stoppinjí nf g.vmn.isium i-iiii-
struction), wc loathethetacticsused
iu sccili'c ilicsc i.'cds. In ijarlirul.il-
we and 17tm uiher studenis ni.:_•.i
thc Insĩstence on a generai amnes-
ty for all protesting groups, sincc
ilis.ilic.lciirc i-. ilni. Ihu '.iulali.r
accepts the puuishment.
Thus thc Univcrsity In the pust
few days lias obviously bcen in-
capable of niiiintaining an atmos-
phere on camp.i. neeessarj tin'.n-a-
sc« bocn cl'l'i'clivoly car.rclird, lim
il lia. Ijcc-ii .-11111 «111 he i:ii|'ii..siblv
fi'l- s'.i!d.'i-,ls lii iliiilk abûat iinylliiii;;
over there is a potentially esplo-
siv. siLuaiin.i n lla.-lemivhichcould
lca. U) '.'iijleinc .iicl llic ílc-ili-iiciiiiil
of Unlvct-sity facilities. Classes
are, however, supposed to contlnue
and the term untU
can studenls do work
I pcrĩod? \.'e suggest
nated imm,?diately and that all stu-
dents bc _cnt homc,
Vincent i.lfleri '69
Warron B. Churg '71
Michael M, Landa 'Tl
Frederick T. Pugarelli '68
April 26, 1968
ttitoterablo Tactica
Ci.l'iil
1 ot tl
dcilc ivith effectively, thoroughly
and immedĩately. We consider thal
re-evaluation of the University"5
futictions, both with respect to the
external community and its own
members is a criticai necessity.
It is obvious th.it Columbla Unl-
vcrsity is moi".i tliiin an academk
institution. It functions as a col-
lcge, graduate school, research in-
stitute, landlord, andemployer. For
students to attach the non-academic
May 1
SucicLy) i.s ivracked by grave and
complo. problcms whose natures
bear on the very prcmissjs tipoii
ivhich lliis ivition is foundud. Giv-
en the comple.vity of these prob-
lems, cspecially as they rclate to
Columbia, and the concomítant im-
:iUc.iii,r: Ihaí ;i,)..i:n|!,i'- ilr ■-i.l'.ition-H
exist, wc r'i'.'l obllgated to con-
front the hitolerabk' l.iclir'. <>f .SDS,
3nd to look forward to a viable
alternatlve.
Wc arc dedply concerncd overthe
fact that the events of the past
two days have polariícd the Col-
ainbia ciiiiiiiiiiaiLy vvilhout reflecting
;hc viows of what we fcel is the
vasl u.i.ii.i'ily of conccrned students
who nill iiu; sa.riíice i-alionalorder
for cmotional otpcdience,
SDS by its coercive actions has
denied our right to jttieiĸ.l clnsscs.
Apparontly SDS values an attempt
a! tlic siiliiiíciii of li.iĸitimule prob-
lems through illejĩkimate means,
SDS dcmattls amnesty for all
members participating in the cur-
rcal distinlmiccs ai a prcci.i-ii-
lion for settlement.
Social protest, in thc tradition of
iihamli ami Iiíiil;, eniails ihc neck's-
sity of assuming respunsibilky for
liiii private citizens is an inap-
IJi'uijj-iace l'k's|),jir.c. ( 'i .llli.bia as a
lundlord should bo attacked as a
landlord and not as an academic
institution; onc should thereforc
protest the construction of the gym
in Morningsidc Park a-i an ordiairy
cili/i.'ii, subject to the due proccss
of thc law.
solutlons, left or
Jumes Meltzer
Paul Miller
Jonathan Souweinc
Lee Zell
April 25, latíS
Deiiiaiith Piinishineiit
Roben 0. liarberi '70Lrw
|