Previous | Next
214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252 of 763
the inefficiency, and had not addressed itself to the basic
issues that I was concerned with. I wasn't concerned with decentralization
as an end. I was concerned with decentralization as
something which would trigger, or, you know, stimulate changes
in individual schools which would be beneficial to the children.
There was no evidence of this. And I therefore didn't see
that I was enthusiastic about decentralization.
Well, to my surprise, about a month later -- I don't know
how long later, but it certainly was more than a few weeks -- the
NEW YORK TIMES reporter got hold of the transcript, and wrote a
long story about my change. And then people started interviewing me,
and I wasn't going to lie.
Then, of course, you know what happened. This was more grist
for the mill of anti-Clark, anti-Kenneth. I could have tried
to back out by saying I was misquoted or something of the sort, but
I wasn't misquoted. When I get in trouble, in terms of things in
the press, it's not because I'm being misquoted, it's because I'm
being quoted correctly. I was quoted correctly, because they had
the transcript, and that's what I believed.
People of the PEA, you know, and other defenders of decentralization
to the bitter end, accused me of being treasonable and all
I don't have many loyalties to things in themselves. I'm
concenned with things in terms of other things that seem to me
to be the important objectives and ends.
© 2006 Columbia University
Libraries | Oral History
Research Office | Rights and
Permissions | Help