Previous | Next
489490491492493494495496497498499500501502503504505506507508509510511512513514515516517518519520521522523524525526 of 617
better: “that while my heart tells me I should be for compulsory
racial balance with the thought that it's helpful to the
black children, my gut tells me that it ain't working and in
fact is destroying the school system -- particularly the public
school system -- and my intellect tells me we ought to know
what the facts are, and to legislate based on the facts and not
on emotion.” Now, that's really the heart of this thing.
Now, when I circulate this thing, there will obviously be
people who say, “Oh, God, there it is -- racism.” But it ain't
racism, and it's very clear that whether you are for bussing
or against bussing, you ought to be for or against it based on
facts and therefore you should want to know what the facts are.
And therefore it would be reasonable to expect you to endorse
that resolution, which I expect to circulate. I know that a
lot of liberals won't do it because they're still afraid, and
they will blame... For example, Jackson has come up with a
resolution which isn't half as good as mine, because that is
somewhat racist in a way. It says that no longer shall a single
judge be able to integrate by way of bussing, but it must be a
three-judge court, and that prior to ordering bussing, they must
also decide as best they can what the impact upon the community
will be in addition to the impact on the children. Basically
what he's talking about is white flight, middle class exodus.
So he's got the kernal of an idea, but mine is better.
© 2006 Columbia University
Libraries | Oral History
Research Office | Rights and
Permissions | Help