Previous | Next
Part: 12 Session: 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536 Page 439440441442443444445446447448449450451452453454455456457458459460461462463464465466467468469470 of 1143
Medical Association finally accepted birth control as a public health measure officially. This made the movement “respectable,” except, as I've said, in Massachusetts and Connecticut. However, it didn't make it universally accepted or universally used, and the people who most need it, like women on relief, are still having a hard time getting it in a city like Chicago and in New York, I'm sure, where we've had a fight in the last four years about it. And I'm sure this is true everywhere, that Catholic doctors and ignorance prevent people most in need of help from getting it.
Then the stamp of approval from the AMA was only the first step.
That's right.
It was, I suppose, a little like Congress authorizing an idea but never actually appropriating the money.
In Connecticut and Massachusetts, legally the information is denied to women, even to those who will die if they don't get it, now, as of today.
Why does this linger on in those two states?
© 2006 Columbia University Libraries | Oral History Research Office | Rights and Permissions | Help