Previous | Next
318319320321322323324325326327328329330331332333334335336337338339340341342343344345346347348349350351352353354355356357358359360361362363364365366367368 of 999
Was Mansfield enthusiastic about this?
Mansfield was moderately enthusiastic and said, “I'll do it if
you can get Hugh Scott to join as a host with me, because I don't want
to seem to make it a partisan matter.”
Laurance Rockefeller went immediately to Hugh Scott's office,
although I don't think he knew him, and Hugh Scott agreed at onceto
be a co-host for a luncheon with Senator Mansfield.
Actually we did this in January and the luncheon was set for
This was a good step, wasn't it, to make it bipartisan?
I thought it was. I thought it should be bipartisan and I thought
it should pass the Senate overwhelmingly and that consequently would make
it easier to get substantial money. The luncheon was held. I paid for
the lunch personally, and I went. There were about 36 Senators present,
but as it took place just before Lincoln's Birthday a great many Senators
who would have come had of course gone home to make speeches.
The key members of the panel made statements at the lunch --
Bruno Schmidt, Stanley Farber, Lee Holland, Mr. Holland, and it was very
much like a panel, but as if they had rehearsed as indeed they had
a script which they were going to recite. However, some questions were
asked, and both Kennedy and Humphrey were there, and there was some
enthusiasm engendered, especially when Anna Hoffman got up and spoke
from a human point of view, not about science, but about human suffering
from cancer. She made a great impression and was very very effective.
She has some deep convictions about it?
© 2006 Columbia University
Libraries | Oral History
Research Office | Rights and
Permissions | Help