Home
Search transcripts:    Advanced Search
Notable New     Yorkers
Select     Notable New Yorker

Frances PerkinsFrances Perkins
Photo Gallery
Transcript

Part:         Session:         Page of 912

who had got onto the idea that the I.L.O. 's basis for agreements was by treaty. That's exactly what it is. The resolution is put forward and in the United States it is a dopted as a treaty, such parts of it as we adopt. We rarely adopt a resolution of the I.L.O. As a matter of fact, most of the resolutions are not as good as the practice and the law of the United States. They're not up to it, so it doesn't matter. But occasionally, like the Seaman's Convention, and a few things like that, we do. Then we adopt it by a treaty, you see. The President authorizes it and the Senate adopts it as a treaty. It is true, it does have precedence over any other laws and statutes--it is quite true, and we've always relied on that.

I know all about the Migratory Bird Case from the first day we went into the I.L.O., because I had to explain it to the Senators in 1934. I had to explain it to the Senators I talked to about it, and what the authority was--what authority there would be. It rested on this decision of the Supreme Court that a treaty has precedence over the statutes of the country.

Well, a few people in Ohio had discovered this, although it was not a matter of any consequence in this country. When the Secretary of Labor did something I think was very stupid of him. Tobin? Well, it was done before Tobin. It was





© 2006 Columbia University Libraries | Oral History Research Office | Rights and Permissions | Help