Previous | Next
Part: 123456789 Session: 1 Page na123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191 of 191
as you know, and it does--and there's no question about this--it does put a question of double loyalty to the most conscientious man who is ever appointed to office. If he is a real Communist, a member of the Communist party, he promises by all that's holy that he will follow the party line and he will not have any private independent judgments, and he's a true believer, if he joins the Communist Party. And that at once puts him in this situation of a questionable loyalty.
But I know a lot of true believers who are not Communists.
Oh well, true believers of something else, not of Communism.
Still you've got that split loyalty; this is the nature of the true believer.
I don't know. I don't know what you mean by that.
Using it in the Eric Hoffer sense.
Well. I see. In that sense, yes. But in general, the true believer hasn't any political views. His true beliefs are about something else. Nevertheless, a man who joins the Communist Party makes certain pledges to the Communist Party. Now, perhaps those pledges are false.
© 2006 Columbia University Libraries | Oral History Research Office | Rights and Permissions | Help