Typed letter from UE to Schenker, dated October 14, 1910 [UE letterhead] Sehr geehrter Herr Professor! Bezugnehmend auf die Unterredung1 mit unserem Herren Direktor übersenden wir Ihnen per Postanweisung K 100.– als Nachzahlung2 auf die “Chromatische Fantasie und Fuge”3 und senden Ihnen beigeschlossen Verlagsschein über Ihre Vorträge über die IX Symphonie4 von Beethoven,5 den wir unterschrieben zurückerbitten, worauf Sie Kopie erhalten. Wir empfehlen uns © Universal Edition A.G., Wien. |
Typed letter from UE to Schenker, dated October 14, 1910 [UE letterhead] Dear Professor, Further to your discussion with our Director,1we are sending you by postal money order: 100.– Kroner as second payment2 for the Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue.3 We are also sending you, enclosed, the publication slip for your Lectures on the Ninth Symphony4 of Beethoven,5 and would ask you to return it to us signed, after which you will receive a copy. We remain, © Translation Ian D. Bent 2006. |
COMMENTARY: *FOOTNOTES 1 Meeting took place earlier the same day. 2 “Nachzahlung”: underlined in crayon, probably by S. 3 The contract, OC 52/423, October 15/17, 1909, offers an honorarium of 200 Kroner, payable half on submission, half on publication. 4 “IX Symphonie”: underlined in crayon, probably by S. 5 This highly significant sentence heralds the eventual publication of his monograph, Beethovens neunte Sinfonie (Vienna: UE, 1912). Schenker had been invited, at the suggestion of Robert Hirschfeld, by the Vereinigung der Musikreferenten in Wien (Association of Music Critics in Vienna) to deliver “a cycle of lectures” (Vortragscyclus) “on the construction of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony” (letter of invitation, OJ 14/44, dated September 30, 1910, i.e. only 15 days before this letter). The Foreword to the monograph reports this; the lectures, he reports, were never given, but: “the invitation by my publisher to transform this work into a monograph has provided the opportunity to make it accessible in a significantly expanded and enriched form to a larger public.” SUMMARY: © Commentary, Footnotes, Summary Ian D. Bent 2006
|