Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Halm, dated January 22, 1927 {recto} [Absender:] Schenker [An:] H [/] Prof. A. Halm [postmark:] || WIEN 49 | 24. I[?].27 9 | [illeg.] || {verso} Für Ihr neues Buch vielen Dank!1 Wegen der Korrekturen des Jb. II2 konnte ich nur einen flüchtigen Blick hineintun, werde aber, nach getaner Pflicht, umso genauer lesen. So oft ich von Ihnen eine Arbeit sehe, überkommt mich das Gefühl, daß wir beide uns, trotz allem, sehr gut zusammenfänden, wenn wir nur erst zueinander sprechen (statt schreiben) könnten. Doch, ich hoffe bald auf Ihr Buch zurückzukommen, dann sage ich mehr. Beste Grüße © In the public domain. |
Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Halm, dated January 22, 1927 {recto} [From:] Schenker, [To:] Prof. A. Halm, [postmark:] || WIEN 49 | 24. I[?].27 9 | [illeg.] || {verso} Many thanks for your new book.1 Because of the proofs for Yearbook II, I could give it only a cursory glance, but will read [it] all the more carefully once my duty has been done. Each time I see a work of yours, the feeling comes over me that we two, despite all, would find ourselves in close accord if only we could first speak with one another (instead of writing). However, I hope to get back to your book soon, and then I will say more. With best wishes, © Translation Ian Bent & Lee Rothfarb, 2006. |
COMMENTARY: FOOTNOTES: 1 Beethoven (Berlin: Max Hesse Verlag, 1927), commented on by S in DLA 69.930/15, July 11, 1927; a copy of this and his other books existed in Schenker’s personal library at its sale: Musik und Theater, enthaltend die Bibliothek des Herrn Dr. Heinrich Schenker, Wien (Vienna: Antiquariat Heinrich Hinterberger, n.d.), item 138. 2 Das Meisterwerk in der Musik, vol. II (Munich: Drei-Masken-Verlag, 1926): S’s manuscript of the volume was sent to the printers only on January 18, 1927 (OC 54,120), and on January 21 proofs of the text and music examples were promised simultaneously (OC 54/125); proofing occupied S February–August, and the volume was released in the September (OC 54/188, September 30). SUMMARY: © Commentary, Footnotes, Summary Ian Bent & Lee Rothfarb, 2006.
|