Previous | Next
Session: 1234567891011121314 Page 640641642643644645646647648649650651652653654655656657658659660661662663664665666667668669670671672673674675676677678679680681682683684685686687688689690691692693694695696697698699700701702703 of 763
Yes. See, actually what that did was to make clear the positions that he had been taking before the courts on affirmative action, a lot of things[?], and it was difficult to avoid.
Now, also coming back to the issues themselves, not just one broad issue, civil rights, wasn't it true that much--probably a majority of the [Senate Judiciary] Committee is not keen on busing, or quotas, affirmative action quotas. But the strategy which Joseph Biden evolved was to focus on voting rights. That presented the Committee with a little different perspective, did it not?
Yes, and the part of the total pattern.
Yes.
Strategic. It was very strategic, that is they were deliberate--
And you already made reference to President Reagan's attitude toward 1964 Civil Rights Act, Voting Act--
And his reluctance to deal with the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
Yes, the renewal of it.
Renewal.
© 2006 Columbia University Libraries | Oral History Research Office | Rights and Permissions | Help