Previous | Next
5960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108 of 763
worked together, and, to come back to your question -- yes. I
think that probably was our dominant theme, aside from humorous things
or humorous editorials or something of that sort. But when we really
got into trouble, it was because we were dealing with the conflict
of interest between an allegedly free university and its dependence
upon a Congress that was dominanted by Southerners who, by virtue
of racism, had seniority.
Well, those are not the kinds of things that good little
students were supposed to be saying in those days, you see. And I
must tell you that the fact of the matter is, we were sort of supported
by some faculty people.
I wanted to ask you about that, because during this time you said
you were meeting with faculty people, they were becoming your friends,
out of class -- did you discuss any of these editorials?
Never before the fact, interestingly enough. Now, that's --
they were not pushing us. They were not quietly using us as a front.
They were clearly happy at what we were doing. They would never chide
us. Obviously, they would never chide us, you know. They'd discuss
things, after. But we were our own --
For example, we never had any faculty censorship of what
we did. It was always, after the fact, concern on the part of the
administration -- and it was restricted pretty much to the administration.
I don't recall any of our faculty friends being critical of
us, although I think they should have been sometimes, because I guess
sometimes we were outlandish, you know. But they never said that, to me--
© 2006 Columbia University
Libraries | Oral History
Research Office | Rights and
Permissions | Help