Previous | Next
Session: 123456789101112131415161718 Page 334335336337338339340341342343344345346347348349350351352353354355356357358359360361362363364365366367368369370371372373 of 617
protecting your industry and the workers you represent. I have a broader interest and that's what I have to protect.” And at the end of the half hour -- and he's very upset -- he says to these fur manfacturers: “That's all right. I'll have Alex Rose call him.” (laughs) But of course Alex Rose won't call me on that. Alex Rose is too decent to call me on such a thing... I hope.
So anyway in the case involving McCarthy and Kennedy, I supported Kennedy and then he was shot. That was a great pity; I was very emotional about that. And that's it.
You want to talk about Bella Abzug?
Yes, except I just wanted to know: what was your degree of enthusiasm when Humphrey became the candidate?
Oh, when Humphrey became the candidate, then the pitch was: “I will not support Hubert Humphrey unless he comes out against the war.” There was that kind of rhetoric, which I maintained until about two weeks before the election. It was rather one to force Humphrey to a better position on the war. He did not have a good position. And (2) it was what the New Left and the reform movement position was in the city, and so I went along with it. I must say I'm not happy with exactly the way I handled it, but I think from a political point of view it was correct. From a courageous, moral point of view, it was not. But I knew that before that election, I was going to come out for Humphrey. We were just planning how do we do that? I mean you had Nat
© 2006 Columbia University Libraries | Oral History Research Office | Rights and Permissions | Help