Previous | Next
599600601602603604605606607608609610611612613614615616617618619620621622623624625626627628629630631632633634635636637638639640641642643644645646647648649650651652653654655656657658659660661662663 of 999
for a taxi from the airport to his home and, you know, all kinds of
small but annoying things.
However, the hearing, I think, was ruined as far as the tobacco
industry went, because we persuaded Humphrey and Marvella Bayh [Mrs.
Birch Bayh] to ask to testify, and they testified, saying how much
was needed and how many patients there were, and that, you know --
they brought the human and patient aspect of it to the fore, which
was of course not at all the intention of Fountain or his committee,
and you had the feeling that the whole effort on Fountain's part was
master-minded by the tobacco industry lobby and some public relations
people working for them.
If you had not been able to refute this effort of the Fountain
committee, what kind of results --?
Well, we would have had even worse pieces of journalism in
the newspapers than we had. These other witnesses were so dramatic
that it distracted the attention of the press, and instead of just
writing the complaints of the people who were opposed to something
or other, that either the Cancer Society or the NCI had done of some
really minor nature, the committee heard
what other people thought . It really diffused --
although there was some very bad publicity about this business of
the money that, you know, some small amounts of money for travel
expenses, you know, and it was blown into something like that.
That makes the headlines, doesn't it?
That makes the headlines. They defused this by having
© 2006 Columbia University
Libraries | Oral History
Research Office | Rights and
Permissions | Help