Previous | Next
284285286287288289290291292293294295296297298299300301302303304305306307308309310311312313314315316317 of 999
Suspension of the rules. And the bill passed 292 to 32.
Suspension of the rules requires unanimous consent, doesn't it?
To bring it up, yes. But Flood who was the chairman of the subcommittee
on appropriations in the House, voted against the bill, and
so did John Rooney, both friends of mine, supposed to be, because I
suppose they're Catholics and they're afraid of the situation in their
districts. I don't know how much money they will finally put in the bill.
I'm hoping that Byrd who put some money in the supplemental appropriations
-- it just came up in the Senate after the bill was passed -- I'm
hoping that he's going to come out of conference with some money. Idon't
know that yet. But it's a landmark bill. EvenNixon's referred to it as
a landmark bill. It's the first time any legislation's been on the book
to do anything about the poor sector of the population in the United
States, about helping them plan their families. This is crazy, but it
took until 1970 to do this.
Was there any concerted opposition on the part of --?
Oh, there'd been tremendous opposition from the church, subtle
opposition of all kinds, and it was considered, until seciath Gruening held his
hearings about four or five years ago that it was totally impossible
to mention the subject of family planning in the Congress; it was so
unpopular with so many people that they would prevent its being discussed.
© 2006 Columbia University
Libraries | Oral History
Research Office | Rights and
Permissions | Help