Previous | Next
262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287288289290291292293294295296297298299300301302303304305306307 of 512
article. I pointed this out to him and said I just didn't see any place in the Times where this
could be published, because we just didn't have a place for that kind of fairly short piece
that was too long and inappropriate as a letter, and not a news story, and not adequate as a
magazine piece, in my view. That was clear.
The next thing Ed did was the obvious thing to do, he sent it over to the Tribune, and it was
published in the place on the editorial page that the Tribune had reserved for outside fairly
short articles, longer than letters. The Herald Tribune had a space that they sometimes
used, under the cartoon.
Right. One can date this, not that it's very important, but one can date this from
determining when the Tribune went out of existence, which I don't really remember.
This was of course before that. In any case, that little incident set me to thinking
that the Times, by God, ought to have a place for just this kind of thing. An outside
commentary on an interesting subject that would be neither - wouldn't be for magazine,
and would be something quite different from letters.
Eventually, this gnawed at my mind, and I thought it was absurd that the Times didn't
have such a place. It would be a great thing if the Times did have more than just one hole
to be occasionally used, as the Tribune did. And I raised this question with Orvil Dryfoos
one day, in one of our walks downtown. We used to walk quite often down to the office
together. And because of that circumstance, I guess that it probably was some time around
1960 or earlier.
© 2006 Columbia University
Libraries | Oral History
Research Office | Rights and
Permissions | Help