Part: 1234         Session: 1234         Page 262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287288289290291292293294295296297298299300301302303304305306307 of 512

I would like to insert here a memo that I've just put my hands on, to go into the part of this discussion that deals with the Op-Ed page in 1967. The reason being that this is a memo May 26, 1967, to Punch, which was ticked off by the departure of Dick Peters, whom I have mentioned as someone that I brought on with the basic idea that he would be handling the Op-Ed page.

He left, I can't remember, under very friendly circumstances, but I think he came to the conclusion that we weren't going to have one.

He'd been looking forward to this assignment, here and he wasn't going to get it.

Oh, yes. Oh, sure. He was doing editorial work also, but this was the thing that he really had in mind, and when he left, under friendly, very friendly circumstances, I sent Punch a note pointing out that his departure suggests again that we really ought to take action on Op-Ed, instead of letting it string on the way we had, and I think, without reading this thing, I think that his memo kind of brings it all up to date, with various points I was making about the letters, the relationship of expanding letters space to an Op-Ed, which I felt was terribly important. I felt that it was a disgrace that the Times was printing such a small percentage of letters received, and a constantly small percentage, because we were receiving more and more letters and had such small space to do it, and this was quite an important point.