Ghazal 33, Verse 3

{33,3}*

bulbul ke kaar-o-baar pah hai;N ;xandah'haa-e gul
kahte hai;N jis ko ((ishq ;xalal hai dimaa;G kaa

1) at the doings of the Nightingale are the smiles of the rose
2) what they call 'passion' is a defect of the mind

Notes:

Nazm:

That is, considering the nightingale to be insane, the roses laugh at him.... The author has removed the word ;haal-e zaar [sorrowful state] and replaced it with kaar -o-baar because kaar means 'sowing' and baar means 'fruit', and these have an affinity with 'rose'. (32)

== Nazm page 32

Vajid:

Urdu text: Vajid 1902 {33}

Bekhud Dihlavi:

The unaffectedness of the second line is worthy of praise and commendation. (63)

Bekhud Mohani:

In the poet's heart, because of constant failures or lack of access for passion, [are grim thoughts]. In such a state he has gone into the garden. Here he's seen the blooming flowers. In his mood, he considers that the roses are laughing at the Nightingale's crazed behavior. (78)

Arshi:

Compare {80,1}. (214)

FWP:

SETS == A,B; DEFINITION
SMILE/LAUGHTER: {27,4}

Arshi is right to point out {80,1}. In it Ghalib recycles a complete line: the first line of the present verse is the second line of {80,1}, word for word. For more on this, see {49,1}.

The rose, the beloved of the garden, smiles at the doings of the Nightingale, who is well-established in the ghazal world as her passionate lover. Why does she smile? Does she find him ludicrous and smile mockingly? Does she feel pity for his plight? Does she ruefully acknowledge her own brief lifespan, since her full-bloom 'smiling' is a sign that her petals will soon fall?

And more to the point, who is the speaker of the second line? Is it a transcription of what is going through the rose's mind, as she smiles? Is it a general statement, of which the proof is the first line? (Lovers are crazy, and the proof is that even the rose laughs at her lover the nightingale.) Could the lover himself be noticing the rose smiling at the nightingale, and then making his own reflection on the condition of passion?

As so often with Ghalib, we are left with two flat statements and forced to make our own judgments about the connections between them. The succinct, colloquial, no-nonsense sound of the second line is indeed, as Bekhud Dihlavi points out, a pleasure in itself.

But I also like the flowing, slightly enigmatic structure of the first line. It is out of prose order, of course, which would be ;xandah'haa-e gul bulbul ke kaar-o-baar pah hai;N, so it calls extra attention to the words moved forward in the sentence; the line might be translated as 'It's at the doings of the nightingale that the rose smiles.' Which puts a new slant on the whole thing. Would the rose not smile at all, if not for the naively romantic carryings-on of the nightingale? Is it to the passionate madness of the nightingale that we owe the glories of spring? (And of course, the imminent death of the rose, within a few days from the time of its first 'smile'.)