Previous | Next
203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265 of 824
Yes, I think that's correct. Yes. I don't think he put
those issues on the same level as what he would have called “the big
issues,” you know, war and peace, politics, and so on and so on.
What do you think were, if any, his political aspirations?
Well, he made a vague pass at running for office in
Connecticut. I think it was at somebody else's urging, probably Sam
Pryor, or somebody like that. I think it's correct to say that the
one post he would have enjoyed would have been Secretary of State.
He didn't--I never felt that he wanted anything else in government.
Then he viewed himself as a world statesman? Is that correct?
Yes, I think that probably is correct. I wouldn't have
used that word, but yes--he really loved going around and talking
with Adenauer or de Gasperi or, you know, the heads of state, about
general world policies.
Well, in that sense, then, what was his view of his
communications vehicle, i.e., his publications?
They tended to reflect his views. He would come back from
talking to Adenauer or de Gasperi or Nehru, or whoever, and report in
full on everything that they have discussed, and what he thought, and
so on and so on. And he was very interesting. I mean, he was very
good at cross-examining them, and getting them to talk.
© 2006 Columbia University
Libraries | Oral History
Research Office | Rights and
Permissions | Help