Ghazal 36, Verse 6

{36,6}

yuusuf us ko kahuu;N aur kuchh nah kahe ;xair hu))ii
gar biga;R bai;The to mai;N laa))iq-e ta((ziir bhii thaa

1) if I would call her 'Yusuf' and she would say nothing-- goodness/benefit occurred
2) if she would insist on quarreling, then I was even/also worthy of punishment

Notes:

;xair : 'Good; goodness; benefit; good fortune, prosperity, welfare, well-being, weal; health; happiness'. (Platts p.498)

 

biga;Rnaa : 'To disagree, be at variance, be estranged, to quarrel; to get out of temper, become angry or enraged; to become vicious, wicked, or unruly; to rebel, revolt, mutiny'. (Platts p.162)

Nazm:

That is, if she gets angry at the idea that I have made her into a slave, then it's proper. (36)

== Nazm page 36

Bekhud Dihlavi:

He says, I called her Yusuf (that is, made her into a slave); it was very fortunate that, hearing this praise from me, she fell silent. If she had become angry, then I deserved punishment for calling her Yusuf. (71)

Bekhud Mohani:

Or this, that she is somewhat more beautiful than Yusuf, and to call her 'Yusuf' is to denigrate her. The subtle implication is also in the verse that the beloved might be angry because he has considered someone else (even if it's Yusuf) to be her equal. (87)

Josh:

I called her Yusuf (that is, Zulaikha bought Yusuf from the bazaar as a slave), and she didn't take it amiss; I consider it my good fortune. (104)

Chishti:

With regard to the principles of style and theme-creation, this verse is of a very high level. How captivatingly he has proved the beloved to be of even greater beauty than Hazrat Yusuf! (364)

FWP:

SETS
SPEAKING: {14,4}

Yusuf is proverbial of course for beauty, and also for cruelty to his lovers (he refused the advances of Zulaikha, even though he went to prison for it). His being a slave is temporary and adventitious, and is far more than cancelled out by his other qualities; Nazm is surely wrong to highlight his period of enslavement, since if the lover thought of the identification that way he'd hardly use such an epithet to the beloved in the first place. Yusuf's beauty is so proverbially great that to call the beloved a 'second Joseph' is a common compliment in the ghazal world (Ghalib uses the epithet affectionately for his brother Yusuf in {202,9}).

But after all, the compliment might also be perceived as limiting: the beloved might feel that she is actually quite a bit more beautiful than Yusuf, and thus might take the comparison as an insult instead. Or perhaps she's arrogant and ill-tempered, and tired of a steady diet of extravagant compliments anyway. Or perhaps she's vexed with the lover for something, and inclined to take amiss anything that he would say. Or perhaps he has no right or permission to speak to her at all, so that anything he says is a great liberty.

For whatever reason, the best possible outcome that the lover can anticipate seems to be silence on her part: that 'she would say nothing'. So if he compliments the beloved extravagantly and she doesn't take it amiss, then-- whew, I lucked out! But if she takes his compliment amiss, then-- sorry, sorry, I'm wrong, it's all my fault, I deserve to be punished! The idea that she might respond favorably doesn't seem to even cross his mind.

Note for grammar fans: The use of bai;Thnaa as a compounder suggests stubbornness, abruptness, determination.