Economic Times (218)

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Aenean ac dolor facilisis, pellentesque turpis ac, posuere ex. Integer dictum neque nec feugiat tristique. Nam interdum tempor augue, at eleifend augue interdum fringilla. Maecenas eget augue et mauris eleifend lacinia. Duis ac nunc mauris. Nullam venenatis dui eu purus pulvinar gravida. Integer ante dui, laoreet porttitor sagittis ac, condimentum et ligula. Quisque hendrerit nisi sit amet neque volutpat auctor vel rhoncus ligula. Donec ut tempor libero.

How to break the TRIPS impasse?

The negotiations on how to allow poor countries to take advantage of the compulsory licensing provision of the TRIPS Agreement are at an impasse. But there is a way to break the logjam. April 3, 2003 The Doha negotiations are at an impasse partially due to a disagreement between the United States and other WTO members on how to effectively extend the compulsory-licensing provision of the TRIPS Agreement to countries that lack manufacturing capacity in medicines. The impasse can be broken The Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement gives all WTO members the right to issue a compulsory licence on a patented product to a third party without prior authorisation of the patent holder in the case of health emergencies or other circumstances of extreme urgency. The Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health reaffirms this right: "Each Member has the right to determine what constitutes a national emergency or other circumstances of extreme urgency, it being understood that public health crises, including those relating to HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria and other epidemics, can represent a national emergency or…

Continue reading...

Your Move, Mr. Jaitley!

The United States has proposed that all tariffs on non-agricultural goods be reduced to 8 percent or less by 2010 and to zero rate by 2015. This offers India a gloden opportunity to either make a huge economic gain or win a major tactical victory. But will Arun Jaitley, India's new Commerce Minister act? February 26, 2003 For more than four decades, developing countries have sought to eliminate developed-country barriers against such labour-intensive products as textiles, clothing and footwear. Until recently, they have had little success. Instead, during 1970s and 1980s, they saw the barriers rise. Bigger developed countries including the United States, European Union and Canada created a system of country-by-country quotas on the imports of textiles and apparel under the so-called Multi-fiber Arrangement. They also maintained unduly high customs duties, referred to as "tariff peaks," on labour-intensive products. As a part of the Uruguay Round Agreement, developed countries finally agreed to dismantle the MFA quotas by the end of 2004. This process has been under way albeit at a snail’s pace since 1995. But no agreement exists as…

Continue reading...

Diwan-e-Khas to Diwan-e-Aam

Policy changes in India are no longer by stealth. Indeed, Kelkar has now brought the process out of the diwan-e-khaas to diwan-e-aam. Critics of his reports have been unsparing but are they right? January 29, 2003 Following the conclusion of the consultation period, the Kelkar taskforces have submitted their final reports. Criticisms in the press notwithstanding, Kelkar must be applauded for his innovation of the process of reform as well as the reform itself. For the first time in India’s reform history, Kelkar began by placing his preliminary recommendations before the public in the form of consultation papers and actively sought its feedback. Though some reacted cynically arguing that the papers were merely trial balloons, having observed the process function efficiently in other countries during his various stints abroad, Kelkar genuinely wanted to move the policy making in India out of the diwan-e-khas into the diwan-e-aam. And judging by the numerous e-mails and memorandums to the taskforces and opinion pieces and commentaries in print and electronic media, the experiment has been a resounding success. For their part, in the final…

Continue reading...

Welcome Aboard Mr. Stern

Abandoning the exclusive focus on the rich country protectionism and complacency towards the poor country protectionism, the World Bank Chief Economist has now forcefully condemned the latter. This is good news. But the World Bank also needs to pay attention to the nuances while propagating the view that agricultural subsidies and protection in the rich countries inflict huge injuries on the poor countries. The removal of these intervention will no doubt benefit the developing countries as a whole but it will also hurt the majority of the poorest countries. December 18, 2002 World Bank Chief Economist Nicholas Stern is reported to have told a gathering of economists in New Delhi this past month that poor countries should unilaterally dismantle their barriers to trade in agriculture in spite of European and American “hypocrisy” in raising farm subsidies. “There is no point in saying to the developed world: ‘You are shooting yourself in the foot so we are going to shoot ourselves in the foot as well,’” said Stern. “The best response is not to shoot yourself in the foot at all.”…

Continue reading...

A tax system for the 21st century

In less than two months, the Kelkar taskforces on direct and indirect taxes have spoken. They propose to overhaul the Indian tax system. The question is whether Jaswant Singh will show the necessary courage. WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2002 I have argued in this column and elsewhere that with the Indian economy now producing goods and services worth approximately Rs 20,00,000 crore annually, policymaking has become too complex to be left exclusively to career bureaucrats. The bureaucrat's instinct is to give priority to putting out daily fires while lighting a few of his own; the specialist is eager to address issues of architecture and engineering of policy. Therefore, when Jaswant Singh appointed Vijay Kelkar as his advisor within days of taking charge as finance minister, he was signalling his intention to repeat the success he had achieved as the external affairs minister. Kelkar is not only a first-rate economist with a Ph D in economics from the University of California, Berkeley but also a long-time insider with a keen sense of how to design good policy in the context of the…

Continue reading...