Previous | Next
102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139 of 755
that's no way to do research. That puts too much of a burden on the person who's listening.
They have to listen, and at the same time turn these pages and watch that metronome.”
Well, he said, “I did it with some research he'd done, not in radio but in something else, on
popular music in Vienna.” And in this broad Viennese accent he assured me that it worked
very, very well. And I said, “There's a better way to do it.” And of course going back to my
work with my own little recorder that I used in radio research in Columbus, in Dayton, I
knew the technology well enough to say we could develop a little machine that would
automatically pass the tape, and then we could [put] people around a table, and they could
press them -- But he didn't understand any of that, or he thought that was -- So, in
retrospect, I'd have to say that --
I guess what I was beginning to say was, in retrospect, I'd have to say that I was
generous in sharing the label on the analyzer. Because it bore no resemblance to the thing
that Paul was talking about, except that it did keep a time line.
Could you explain exactly what it did do?
© 2006 Columbia University
Libraries | Oral History
Research Office | Rights and
Permissions | Help