Previous | Next
233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287288289 of 755
there are some people, if you can afford them in an organization, who can bring a lot to an
organization if they have that kind of freedom. But that's another subject.
But this was a conviction actually that you brought to the founding of the Center from
your work at CBS, or your work in a corporation where --
No, I don't know where it came from.
You don't know where it came from.
No. The argument is you lose a lot of time by not having a structured agenda. On
the other hand, if you got the right people who bring a rich experience and wisdom to the
meeting, you frequently get more than you anticipate out of any advanced planning. So it's a
trade-off. But if I had to run a meeting today, a board meeting, I don't run it on an open
ended agenda, I damn well have a scheduled agenda. I don't want to give you the impression
that it's a free-wheeling affair. But for things such as the center represented, no one has the
-- in my opinion then nor now, has the skill or the wisdom to say: This is what we're going to
do. If you get a collection of bright people, and you can achieve any kind of focus during the
discussion, you can, I think, get rich dividends. And if you're going to spend a year, let the
people find their own way through the things they want to talk about or give their time to,
and don't try to say, this is what it's going to be.
To a certain extent, the Center pre-ordained the direction of the year by the concept of
© 2006 Columbia University
Libraries | Oral History
Research Office | Rights and
Permissions | Help