Ghazal 8, Verse 4x

{8,4x}*

ravaaniihaa-e mauj-e ;xuun-e bismil se ;Tapaktaa hai
kih lu:tf-e be-ta;haashaa-raftan-e qaatil pasand aayaa

1) from the flowingnesses of the wave of the blood of the slaughtered one there drips
2) [the fact] that the grace/piquancy of the headlong going/departure of the murderer pleased [it/him]

Notes:

ravaanii : 'Going, proceeding; course; running; currency; flowing, flow, flux; effusion; fluency'. (Platts p.603)

 

lu:tf : 'Delicacy; refinement; elegance, grace, beauty; the beauty or best (of a thing); taste; pleasantness; gratification, pleasure, enjoyment; --piquancy, point, wit; --courtesy, kindness, benignity, grace, favour, graciousness, generosity, benevolence, gentleness, amenity'. (Platts p.957)

 

be-ta;haashaa : 'Inconsiderate, without distinction; rash, reckless; rashly, recklessly, headlong'. (Platts p.202)

 

raftan : 'To go, going, going away, departing; dying'. (Platts p.595)

Gyan Chand:

;Tapaktaa hai means 'is apparent'. The blood of the slaughtered one is flowing swiftly, making waves. Meanwhile the murderer, having murdered him, had run headlong away. It seems that the the murderer's style of fleeing has pleased the blood of the wounded one, and it too is running in the same manner. (64)

FWP:

SETS == GROTESQUERIE

For background see S. R. Faruqi's choices.

This is a verse in which the dead lover (or at least the 'wave' of his blood) continues to 'speak', or at least to think and communicate; for more such examples, see {57,1}. And the use of 'flowingnesses' makes it one of Ghalib's verses in which abstractions are unexpectedly pluralized; for others, see {1,2}.

The imagery of flowing and moving is conspicuous: 'flowingnesses', 'wave', 'drips', 'going', 'came' [aayaa]. But the linchpin of the verse is surely 'drips'. As Gyan Chand observes, 'drips' seems here to describe a revealing of information to the observer. (In fact the grammar of the verse is so tightly structured that there's no other way to put it together.) For more examples of such 'dripping', see {17,2}.

The murdered lover's blood moves in a wave, with such 'flowingness' that information drips from it. The 'flowingness' itself is also a literary term for one of the virtues of a good ghazal verse. And it echoes or evokes the style in which the beloved murderer ran headlong away after her bloody deed. Did she run with such 'grace', and was there a kind of 'piquancy' or 'gratification' in seeing her run? And does the 'flowingness' of the blood express its admiration by actually seeking to follow the fleeing beloved, or does it just quietly ripple to itself in appreciation?

Though I can see the skill of its wordplay, this verse is right on the edge (or perhaps over the edge) of what I call 'grotesquerie'. Do we really have to imagine, all too graphically, a wave of blood flowing out so fast and powerfully and expressively from the murdered lover that it's actually a form of post-death communication? And if we don't imagine it literally, then what's left of the verse?