ASSIGNMENT 2: Cybersquatting

- Lanham Act § 43
- UDRP § 4
Data on UDRP Bias:  Professor Geist has updated the study of UDRP bias discussed at page 39 of the casebook.  Analyzing the results of all cases decided through Feb. 18, 2002, he concludes that complainants win 83 percent of single-member panel cases (83% of WIPO cases, 86% of Nat'l Arb. Forum cases, and 64% of eResolution cases).  Complainants win only 58% of three-member panel cases (62% of WIPO cases, 49% of NAF cases, and 50% of eResolution cases).

Looking separately at cases in which there is no response (54% of all cases), the complainant wins 94% of the time (92% of WIPO cases, 98% of NAF cases, and 79% of eResolution cases.

Looking separately at cases in which a response is filed, complainants win 68% of the single-member panel cases (70% of WIPO cases, 69% of NAF cases, and 50% of eResolution cases).  For three-member panel cases in which a response is filed, complainants win 46% of the cases (48% of WIPO cases, 42% of NAF cases, and 47% of eResolution cases).

The study notes that eResolution (plainly the least complainant-friendly dispute-resolution provider) is now in bankruptcy.  It ceased operations in the early months of 2002.

                     *          *          *          *          *          *

Cybersquatting:  There are several recent cases of interest on cybersquatting.  The material that follows provides citations to three of the most interesting cases, links to edited versions of those cases, and a multi-part problem that you can assign to cover the content of those cases.

     * Problem S2

 

                     *          *          *          *          *          *

Before Zuccarini at page 44, add Taubman v. Webfeats. The text is available here.
There are no diagrams for this assignment.

  • Laurence R. Helfer & Graeme B. Dinwoodie, Designing Non-National Systems: The Case of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy, 43 William & Mary L. Rev. 141 (2001) -- a comprehensive analysis of the development of the UDRP and the problems manifested in its operation.

  • For a thorough and highly readable account of the difficult process that led to the formation of ICANN, see Milton L. Mueller, Ruling the Root: Internet Governance and the Taming of Cyberspace (2002).

  • To get always up-to-date information about ICANN, we recommend the various web pages of Michael Froomkin, including his main page at http://www.law.tm and also a page at www.icannwatch.org.

  • Jonathan Weinberg, ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy, 50 Duke L.J. 187 (2000), contains a good overview of the history of the domain name system and ICANN's ongoing problems.

 

Cybersquatting
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
National Arbitration Forum (NAF)
Typosquatting
Uniform Dispute Resolution Procedure (UDRP)
Wholesaling domain names
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)

 

 
OUTLINE | ASSIGNMENTS | STATUTES | UPDATES | DIAGRAMS | GLOSSARY | 2ND EDITION SITE