ASSIGNMENT 40:
Jurisdiction
and Conflict of Law
|
|
| There are no statutes for this assignment. |
|
|
| At page 596 of the text, add Gator.com Corp. v. L.L. Bean, Inc., 341 F.3d 1072 (9th Cir. 2003) after Neogen. The text is available here.
|
|
|
| There are no diagrams for this assignment. |
|
|
- Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal
Practice & Procedure, sec. 1073.1 -- A careful and
cogent summary of the cases considering the boundaries
of personal jurisdiction based on Internet-based activity.
- Digital Control Inc. v. Boretronics, 161 F. Supp. 2d
1183 (W.D. Wash. 2001) (holding that an advertiser has
not "purposely directed" its activities at a
particular forum until it "is actually faced with
and makes the choice to dive into a particular forum")
- American Information Corp. v. American Infometrics Inc.,
139 F. Supp. 2d 696 (D. Md. 2001) (although defendant's
site provided "interactivity" in the form of
links to search engines, price lists, and contact information,
and the site generally was directed at finding customers
in the United States, no jurisdiction in Maryland court
because there was no evidence that the defendant had ever
targeted Maryland in particular and or actually fielded
any queries from Maryland prospective customers)
|
|
|
|
Graphical User Interface
(GUI)
Streaming Media
Trademark Dilution
Unsolicited Commercial Email
(UCE)
|
|
| |
|
|