Ghazal 8, Verse 2

{8,2}

bah fai.z-e be-dilii naumiidii-e jaaved aasaa;N hai
kushaayish ko hamaaraa ((uqdah-e mushkil pasand aayaa

1) thanks to dejection/'heart-lessness', eternal hopelessness is easy
2) 'Opening' found our difficult knot pleasing

Notes:

be-dilii : 'Heartlessness [i.e., being disheartened], dejection; dissatisfaction, discontent'. (Platts p.202)

 

kushaayish : 'Opening, loosening, solving, breaking (a fast); expansion, enlargement; ...clearness, serenity, cheerfulness'. (Platts p.836)

Nazm:

That is, thanks to the distaste and disaffection that I feel toward the world, it's easy for me to endure the shock of hopelessness and despair .... Now it [=our difficult knot] will never be opened, because Opening is pleased that it should remain knotted-- pleased because we don't care, and why wouldn't such indifference be pleasing to Opening? (9)

== Nazm page 9

Vajid:

Urdu text: Vajid 1902 {8}

Bekhud Dihlavi:

Here be-dilii also is used to mean naa-umiidii . Mirza Sahib says, only thanks to hopelessness has perpetual failure become easy .... In the second line the meaning has been expressed that our difficult knot has become pleasing to Opening. The rule is that when something suits someone's temperament, and pleases him, then he tries to keep it established, and as much as possible busies himself in protecting it. When Opening became pleased by our difficult knot, why would he allow it to open? (20)

Bekhud Mohani:

The result is that the mood [kaifiyat] of peace that we had obtained thanks to hopelessness, then came to an end. And Opening, in its attempt to solve our difficult knot, gathered material for more difficulties. (15)

FWP:

SETS == OPPOSITES
DIFFICULT/EASY: {6,5}

ABOUT be-dilii : The awkward hyphen in 'heart-lessness' is there to try to block the usual modern English meaning of cruelty and coldness. (But to Platts, 'heartlessness' apparently meant having no 'heart' in the sense of courage or spirit; see the definition above.) In the ghazal world, this state of be-dilii is a Sufistic one of literally possessing no heart, because one has lost it, given it away, dissolved it into blood, or the like. (The complexities are like those of be-xudii , 'self-lessness'; on this see {21,6}.) In addition, Ghalib often uses be-dil to create wordplay on the pen-name of his early hero and role model, the Indo-Persian poet Bedil; for discussion see {8,5x}.

ABOUT KNOTS: Knots make for fine Persian metaphors: for example, one section of Jami's famous 'Yusuf and Zulaikha' is entitled 'The Knotting with Perplexity of the Rope of Anxiety of her Maids from their seeing the Change in the Condition of Zuleikha, and the unloosing by her Nurse with the Point of the Finger of Enquiry of the Knots of that Rope' ({194,5}). More often, the lover's heart itself is imagined to be a knot-- one that is 'disordered, entangled' [pareshaan], and is to be opened (or not) by the 'fingernails' of whatever abstraction suits the poet. Other 'knot' verses: {29,5x}; {30,3}; {48,3}; {105,4x}; {128,2x}; {190, 11x}; {214,4}; {222,4x}; {230,12x}, girih // {253x,6}, the 'fingernails' of a sword; {257x,5}.

To personify 'Opening' must be pretty close to the height of abstraction; Ghalib is fond of such madly metaphysical personifications. This verse also reminds me of the extremely abstract {157,5}. The question is not how hard we have to work to 'get' the verse, but whether what we then 'get' is sufficiently rewarding. This verse always irritates me a bit because the game doesn't seem worth the candle.

And how are the two lines related to each other? The usual Persian/Urdu image, parallel to the English metaphor of 'unravelling' a 'knotty' problem, is that one 'loosens the knot' of the problem with the 'fingernails of thought'. Here, the heart is gone entirely, so there is no 'knot' to open at all: the pain of perpetual hopelessness is no great problem if there is no one around to experience it.

'Opening' was pleased by our 'difficult knot'-- perhaps it was intrigued because no 'opening' was even required, since the knot solved the problem itself by vanishing. Or perhaps 'Opening' did in fact struggle with the knot, and succeeded in opening it only by dint of wearing it away into nothingness. After all, this is exactly what happens in {48,3}.